For Manchester United supporters the 2013/14 season is one
best forgotten, as the transition from the legendary Sir Alex Ferguson to David
Moyes proved to be every bit as difficult as many of them had feared. The team
dropped to a relatively low 7th place in the Premier League, which was not only
the first time United had finished outside the top two positions since 2005,
but also meant that they failed to qualify for Europe – almost unthinkable for
a club of this stature.
However, this did not stop United reporting a fantastic set
of financial results with revenues up 19% (£70 million) to a record high of
£433 million and EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxation, Depreciation and
Amortisation) up 20% (£22 million) to £130 million. Mainly as a result of this
impressive growth and vastly reduced interest payments, which were down 61%
(£43 million), last season’s loss before tax of £9 million improved to a
healthy profit of £41 million.
Profit after tax did fall from £146 million to £24 million,
as 2012/13 benefited from a £155 million credit, largely due to the recognition
of US deferred tax assets, which was a special once-off case.
Exceptional Items were £5m, almost entirely due to the
compensation paid to Moyes and his coaching staff when they were shown the
door. The previous year’s £6 million also included £2 million for coaching
staff leaving as a result of Ferguson’s retirement plus £4 million professional
advisory fees in connection with the IPO (Initial Public Offering).
The 2014 profit of £41 million represents a remarkable
turnaround compared to 2009/10 when the club registered a loss of around the
same amount (£44 million) and follows two seasons of small losses: £5 million
in 2012 and £9 million in 2013.
Of course, the profits would have been substantially higher
if the club did not have to bear the financing costs of the Glazers’ leveraged
buy-out. In fact, over the last six years United have made total operating
profits of £426 million, which has been almost totally wiped out by net
financing costs of £425 million.
The good news for the club is that these costs have fallen
from £117 million in 2009 to “only” £27 million in 2014. This season alone
these costs were cut by £43 million from £70 million, primarily due to a £32
million reduction in premium paid as a result of the repurchases of senior
secured notes and £13 million reduction in interest payable following another
refinancing in 2013.
Revenue rose 19% (£70 million) from £363 million to £433
million, mainly due to commercial revenue, which grew 24% (£37 million) from
£152 million to £189 million, and broadcasting revenue, up 34% (£34 million)
from £102 million to £136 million. Match day revenue dipped slightly from £109
million to £108 million.
The 49% growth in sponsorship revenue (£45 million) to £136
million was particularly striking, due to several new sponsorships, higher
renewals and a significant increase from the pre-season tour and promotional
games (which brought in £11 million in 2014).
Retail, merchandising and product licensing revenue
decreased £1 million to £38 million, primarily due to lower money from the Nike
agreement, while mobile and content revenue dropped by £7 million to £16
million, due to the expiration of a few mobile partnerships.
Unsurprisingly, United’s revenue of £433 million is by far
the highest in England, around £86 million more than their neighbours
Manchester City, followed by Chelsea £320 million and Arsenal £299 million.
However, their growth rate is lower than the others at 19% (albeit from a
higher base) with City growing by 28%, and Chelsea and Arsenal both by 23%.
United’s revenue mix is probably the envy of many other
clubs, as it is a relatively even split, compared to those who have an
unhealthy reliance on TV money. That said, commercial is now up to 44%, while
broadcasting is also higher at 31%, leaving match day at 25%.
In 2012/13, the last season where all clubs have reported,
United had the 4th highest revenue in the world with £363 million, but were a long way off top
spot, being £82 million behind Real Madrid's £445 million.
However, their growth this season plus a more favourable
exchange rate means that they are likely to be only just below Madrid in the
next Deloitte Money League. In 2012/13 Deloitte used the 30 June 2013 rate of
1.1668, so they will almost certainly use the 30 June 2014 rate of 1.25 for the
next edition. This means that United’s revenue of £433 million will be €542
million, very nearly the same as Madrid’s €550 million (excluding player
sales), and overtaking Bayern Munich €488 million and Barcelona €485 million.
One of the main drivers for the English clubs’ high revenue
growth is the new Premier League TV deal, which commenced in the 2013/14
season. In United’s case, their share of the Premier League pie increased 47%
(£28 million) from £61 million to £89 million.
The other main element of broadcasting revenue is the Champions League, which increased £8 million from £31 million (€36 million) to £39 million (€45 million), due to progressing to the quarter-final stage compared to the last 16 in the prior year and receiving a larger share of the UK market pool due to better 2014 Champions League progress and finishing 1st in the Premier League in the 2012/13 season compared to 2nd in 2011/12. United will obviously lose this revenue in 2014/15 season following their failure to qualify for Europe’s flagship competition.
Despite United’s significant commercial growth, their 2014 commercial revenue of £189 million is still behind Bayern Munich, whose revenue also rose
to £233 million. PSG’s 2013 commercial revenue of £218 million was inflated by
a €200 million partnership with the Qatar Tourism Authority.
However, United are re-establishing their dominance of the
commercial scene in England, as they are increasing the gap to their nearest
challengers, Manchester City, who are £23 million lower at £166 million. Both
Manchester clubs are miles ahead of the other English clubs with the next
highest Liverpool at £98 million (though in fairness this is the 2012/13
figure). And remember, this is before United’s new deals with Chevrolet and
Adidas kick in.
United’s ability to extract value from their shirt
sponsorship is almost unprecedented. Aon have been paying an average of £20
million in the last four years, but this will rise to an incredible £46 million
a year when Chevrolet take over the sponsorship from the 2014/15 season. The
new deal runs to the end of the 2020/21 season and is worth $70 million in the
first season, rising by an additional 2.1% each season afterwards. Amazingly,
Chevrolet also paid United $18.6 million in each of the 2012/13 and 2013/14
seasons for “pre-sponsorship support and exposure”.
Aon have not completely exited the scene though, as they
will pay for the privilege of being United’s training kit partner until 2020/21
including renaming the training facilities at Carrington as the Aon Training
Complex.
On top of that, United continue to announce new
sponsorships. In 2013/14 alone this included 3 global sponsors, 9 regional
sponsors and 8 financial services and telecom partnerships.
Furthermore, United have also signed the “largest kit
manufacture sponsorship deal in sport” with Adidas, which is worth £750 million
over 10 years or an average of £75 million a year from the 2015/16 season. This
is, deep breath, £50 million higher than the current Nike deal – every year. It
is true that success clauses are built into this contract, e.g. if United fail
to participate in the Champions League for two or more consecutive seasons
starting with the 2015/16 season, then the payment for that year would reduce
up to 30%, but it is still an astonishing deal.
In addition, retail, e-commerce and licensing will revert to
United from August 2015, as opposed to the current deal whereby any profits
generated from these activities is shared equally between the club and Nike.
United’s match day revenue fell slightly to £108 million,
due to hosting some games for the London Olympics the prior year, though this
may well still be the highest in world football, as it was in 2012/13. United
emphasise premium seating and hospitality facilities in order to maximise match
day revenue, as can be seen by Old Trafford having 154 luxury boxes,
approximately 8,000 executive club seats, 15 restaurants and 4 sports bars. In
fact, the 2014 revenue included £54 million from gate receipts and £33 million
from hospitality. However, the match day revenue stream will also fall in
2014/15, as no European games will be hosted at Old Trafford.
In line with revenue, United’s wage bill rose 19% (£34
million) to £215 million, due to player purchases and renegotiated player
contracts, which maintained the wages to turnover ratio at the 50% level it has
been for the last three seasons.
In 2014 United once again had the highest wage bill in
English football, as Manchester City reduced theirs to £205 million. United
were around £50 million higher than Arsenal, while Chelsea are still to report
2013/14 wages.
Interestingly, United now also have the highest wage bill in
Europe with €269 million, having overtaken Real Madrid €250 million and
Barcelona €248 million. Much of this is due to the exchange rate used (this
calculation is based on the 1.25 rate that Deloitte are likely to use in their
2014 Money League) and it also depends on how clubs account for things like image rights, but it does give you pause for thought.
United’s cash machine has really swung into action in the last few
seasons in the transfer market. Their net spend for the 10 years up to 2011/12
was only £114 million (obviously deflated due to Ronaldo’s £80 million sale to
Real Madrid), but they have spent a net £231 million in the last three seasons,
as Moyes and then van Gaal have recruited (expensive) new blood, including Juan
Mata, Marouane Fellaini, Angel Di Maria, Ander Herrera, Luke Shaw, Marcos Rojo
and Daley Blind.
As a result of this higher transfer activity, player amortisation (the annual cost of writing-off transfer fees) was up by nearly a third in 2014, increasing from £42 million to £55 million.
As a result of this higher transfer activity, player amortisation (the annual cost of writing-off transfer fees) was up by nearly a third in 2014, increasing from £42 million to £55 million.
Their net spend of £231 million in the last three years is
much higher than any other Premier League club, including previously big
spending Chelsea £137 million and Manchester City £128 million, both of whom
have been somewhat held back by FFP restrictions.
United’s net debt was again reduced by £20 million from £295
million to £275 million. Actually, gross debt was down £47 million from £389
million to £342 million, but cash also fell by £28 million from £94 million to
£66 million.
In September 2012 the net proceeds from the IPO were used to
reduce the club’s indebtedness by repurchasing £63 million of the US Dollar
senior secured notes, while a further £209 million of borrowings were
refinanced (senior secured notes retired and replaced by a new secured term
loan).
Overall, as good a performance off the pitch last season as
it was bad on it for Manchester United. It is true that revenue will fall in 2014/15 as a result of no Champions
League, with the club itself forecasting £385-395 million compared to £433
million this year, but if van Gaal can manage to lead United back into Europe,
then the following year’s financials will look stellar with the new Chevrolet and
Adidas deals both fully on board.
Cheers. Good to see you back in action.
ReplyDeleteThe plain vanilla analyst (but not the average fotball fan) would like more details on that tax credit, will it reduce paid taxes in the coming years?
ReplyDeleteIt seems one must hope for some financial difficulties for Chevrolet in order to maintain suspense in the PL in the coming years or else it will become a one team race.
Surely City's commercial revenue must have been exaggerated in that it mainly comes from Abu Dhabi group's influence just like Qatar group does for PSG. There should be no problem with it but if regulations are there and every one pretends to be following it, then UEFA needs to look at the related party transactions and its over arching influence. I appreciate that unlike other clubs owned by private businesses these two are essentially state funded entities but to pretend that they are increasing commercial revenue compared to more traditional and hugely popular clubs outside of United is a farce and makes a mockery of everything. Imagine Russia or China start buying up clubs in the EPL.
ReplyDeletePSG's silly sponsorship will have been downgraded by UEFA. UEFA found no issue with MCFC's sponsorships however. The MCFC CEO Soriano did a similarly fantastic job with Barcelona's commercial growth
DeleteOr even American millionaires who take money out of a club and put little back - it doesn't bear thinking about does it? CSKA are known as the Red Army team by the way, Arsenal shirts are sponsored by Emirates, Barcelona by Qatar Airways both of which have close links to the state. State sponsorship of football clubs has been going on for years by the way - particularly in the east European bloc countries.
ReplyDeleteMANU has said their wages should only be £200m this season given they aren't playing in European competitions which I still thought was surprising given how many people they signed.
ReplyDeleteLet me make a correction, Juventus didn't played UEFA Cup final (SL Benfica did), therefore the value in your chart is wrong
ReplyDeleteYou're right. I somehow managed to transpose the figures from the source document. Thanks for the correction.
DeleteFantastic blog, Can you given an example of what the £8.7m depreciation is likely to be? Thanks
ReplyDeleteWhen you found this information? for example profit and loss acount?
ReplyDelete