Following the treble winning season in 2012/13, Bayern
Munich enjoyed another year of success in 2013/14, once again securing the
domestic league and cup double, while reaching the Champions League semi-finals
before going down to eventual winners Real Madrid.
The excellent season on the pitch was matched off it with
revenue surging 13% to €487.5 million and profit before tax up to €25.9 million
(€16.5 million after tax). Furthermore, all outstanding debt on the club’s
Allianz stadium was paid off 15 years early. Little wonder that deputy chairman
Jan-Christian Dreesen stated, “FC Bayern can present its members with financial
results better than any the club has ever had before.”
Bayern’s profit before tax rose €3 million (15%) from €23
million to €26 million, as the €55 million growth in commercial income and €40
million increase in profits on player sales was largely offset by a €12 million
increase in the wage bill and an €80 million rise in other expenses.
Note that these are the consolidated group accounts for FC
Bayern München AG, which include the Allianz Arena München Stadion GmbH and all
subsidiaries.
Of course, making money is nothing new to Bayern Munich, as
this is the 22nd year in a row that they have been profitable. Traditionally,
the club invests almost all of its profits into the squad or stadium
development, but their profits have been steadily rising recently, averaging €14
million over the last three years (after tax).
That’s very impressive, though it should be noted that it is
not unusual for German clubs to make profits. In fact, 13 out of 18 Bundesliga
clubs posted positive figures in the 2013/14 season.
Bayern retained 3rd position in the Deloitte Money League
for 2013/14 with €488 million, only behind Real Madrid €550 million and
Manchester United €518 million. At this point, we should clarify that Bayern’s
reported revenue of €529 million in the club statement also includes €41
million from player transfers, which is excluded for the Money League.
Although they overtook Barcelona €485 million, Bayern were
in turn passed by Manchester United, partly due to Sterling strengthening
against the Euro (1.1668 to 1.1958 in Deloitte’s calculations), but also
because English clubs grew at a faster rate, due to the new Premier League TV
deal. On the other hand, Bayern’s 13% revenue growth is much more than the
Spanish giants: Real Madrid 6%, Barcelona 0%.
There are only two other German clubs in the Money League
(Borussia Dortmund €262 million and Schalke 04 €214 million), but Bayern earn
around twice as much as their nearest domestic challengers with €488 million.
Not only is the gap large, but it is getting larger. Since 2007,
Bayern has grown its revenue by €265 million, while Dortmund’s growth was €172
million and Schalke €100 million. Bayern’s revenue superiority over the second
highest club was €103 million in 2007, but has climbed to €226 million in 2014.
Even worse, revenue at clubs like Hamburg, Werder Bremen and Stuttgart has
essentially been flat over this period, leading to concern that Bayern’s
financial dominance will be bad for competition in Germany.
To further illustrate this point, the revenue disparity between
Bayern and Borussia Dortmund has never been higher at €226 million. This is a
worthy comparison, despite Dortmund’s current poor form, as their closest challengers won the Bundesliga twice in recent years (2010/11 and 2011/12) and
narrowly lost to their Bavarian rivals in an all-German Champions League final
in 2012/13. Although the gap off the pitch had closed to “only” €172 million,
it is now growing again.
Revenue grew by €56 million (13%) in 2013/14, almost
entirely driven by commercial income, which rose €55 million (23%) to a mighty
€292 million. Match day and broadcasting revenue each rose by around 1%.
Since 2009, Bayern’s revenue has grown €198 million (68%)
from €290 million to €488 million with all three revenue streams showing good
growth: commercial up €133 million (83%), broadcasting up €38 million (55%) and
match day up €27 million (45%). Most notably, merchandising revenue has almost
tripled in that period, rising from €37 million to €105 million.
The growth in commercial income to €292 million means that
it now contributes 60% of Bayern’s revenue with broadcasting at 22% (€108
million) and match day 18% (€88 million). Only one other club in the Money
League top 20 has commercial income contributing more than 50% of total
revenue: that is Paris Saint-Germain, thanks to the French club’s innovative
deal with the Qatar Tourism Authority.
Indeed PSG is the only club with higher commercial revenue
than Bayern with €328 million, though Bayern are well ahead of clubs like Real
Madrid €232 million and Manchester United €226 million. Although commercial
deals are very important to all German clubs, Dortmund €124 million and Schalke
€104 million earn 2-3 times less than Bayern.
Bayern’s incredible commercial revenue of €292 million is
made up of: sponsoring and marketing €118 million, merchandising €105 million,
Allianz Arena €49 million and other commercial activities €20 million. Bayern
do have the advantage of being the most supported team in the largest
commercial market in Europe, but that’s still some going.
They are also boosted by strategic partnerships with three
major German companies (Adidas, Allianz and Audi), who all have an 8.33% stake
in the club with the other 75% owned by the fans. Adidas has a long-standing
relationship with Bayern, recently extending their kit deal for a further eight
years until 2020 for a reported €25 million a season. Allianz have also
extended their stadium naming rights deal for a further five years to 2041 at
around €6 million a season, while Audi is a main sponsor and automotive
partner.
In addition, Deutsche Telekom extended their shirt
sponsorship deal in 2013/14 for four years, reportedly increasing the annual
fee by €5 million to €30 million. Bayern has a raft of other big name sponsors,
including Lufthansa, Coca-Cola and Samsung.
The Allianz Arena is another major money-spinner for Bayern.
They initially shared ownership with TSV 1860 Munich, but have fully owned the
venue since 2006, leasing it back to their former partners since then. Bayern
benefits from all other activities staged at the Arena, including concerts and
German national team matches.
Perhaps the most staggering figure is from merchandising
sales, which rose €22 million (28%) in the last season alone to €105 million.
This means that over a fifth of Bayern’s revenue is generated by shirt sales
and the like. In fact, Bayern sold 1.3 million replica shirts in 2013/14, which
was more than the total sales of all other Bundesliga clubs combined.
Where Bayern (and other German clubs) lose out is in
broadcasting revenue, largely due to the Bundesliga TV rights, which lag behind
the deals in England, Italy and Spain (at least for the big two). Bayern’s
total broadcasting revenue of €108 million is not too bad, but it is only
around half of Real Madrid’s €204 million – and is even behind Tottenham
Hotspur’s €113 million, even though the North London club did not qualify for
the Champions League.
Bayern’s accounts state that they received €47 million from
the Bundesliga TV distribution, up €10 million from the previous season. This
included €37 million for the TV rights, almost entirely from the domestic deal,
plus other money from central partnership deals with the likes of Adidas.
The German TV distribution is based on a points system,
whereby points are awarded for finishing places in the Bundesliga over the last
five seasons, weighted towards the most recent seasons, e.g. for 2013/14 the
points are distributed as follows: 2013/14 factor of 5; 2012/13 factor of 4;
2011/12 factor of 3; 2010/11 factor of 2; 2009/10 factor of 1. The calculated
points are then used to determine which place the club has in the distribution
table, but the actual distribution is fixed, so that the last placed club
receives half of the top place (for the domestic deal) with payments spread
evenly for the clubs in between.
To place the Bundesliga TV deal into context, Cardiff City,
who finished last in the Premier League in 2013/14, received €74 million TV money,
which is significantly more than Bayern’s €47 million.
The good news for German clubs is that the Bundesliga TV
rights are increasing and are forecast to almost double in the 10 years from
2006/07, increasing from €424 million to €835 million. In particular,
international rights are anticipated to grow from the current €70 million to
€154 million in 2015/16 and €162 million in 2016/17, though this will still be
significantly lower than the Premier League. It is also worth noting that these
TV rights cover the two top German leagues, e.g. in 2013/14 the €560 million
domestic deal is split between Bundesliga 1 €448 million and Bundesliga 2 €112
million.
The news is much better for Bayern in Europe, where they
received €45 million for reaching the semi-finals in the Champions League,
though this represented a €10 million reduction compared to the previous
season, when they received €55 million as winners. This has been a lucrative
revenue stream for Bayern in recent times, as they have averaged €44 million a
season over the last five years – since the disappointing 2007/08 season when
they earned less than €5 million for participating in the UEFA Cup.
Despite Germany’s reputation for low ticket prices, Bayern’s
match day revenue of €88 million is the fifth largest in the world, as they
enjoy average attendances of more than 71,000, though the four clubs ahead of
them all generate more than €100 million: Manchester United €129 million,
Arsenal €120 million, Barcelona €117 million and Real Madrid €114 million.
In fairness, the Bundesliga only has 18 clubs, so Bayern
play two fewer home matches a season compared to the other major leagues. The
average revenue per match of €3.5 million is substantially more than any other
German team and compares favourably to other Money League clubs.
Bayern’s wage bill rose 6% (€12 million) from €203 million
to €215 million in 2013/14, but the wages to turnover ratio fell to a very
impressive 44%, the lowest for many years, following the significant revenue
growth.
Again, it is interesting to contrast the wages growth with
Dortmund. Over the last seven years, the gap has averaged almost exactly €100
million, with Bayern’s €215 million wage bill being twice as much as Dortmund’s
€108 million last season.
Using the same exchange rate as Deloitte’s Money League,
Bayern have the 6th highest wage bill in world football, a fair way behind
Manchester United €257 million, Real Madrid (only football wages, i.e.
excluding basketball) €250 million, Barcelona €248 million, Manchester City
€245 million and Chelsea €230 million. Only Real Madrid (45%) have a wages to
turnover ratio close to Bayern’s 44%.
Traditionally, Bayern Munich have been the big spenders in
the German transfer market, often acquiring the strongest players from rivals,
e.g. Manuel Neuer from Schalke and Mario Götze and Robert Lewandowski from
Dortmund. Since 2002/03 they have splashed out more than half a billion Euros
on bringing in players with a net spend of €335 million after player sales.
Even with net sales of €2 million in 2014/15, Bayern still
brought in Mehdi Benatia from Roma €28 million, Xabi Alonso from Real Madrid
€10 million and Juan Bernat from Valencia €10 million, though this was offset
by the sales of Toni Kroos to Real Madrid €30 million and Mario Mandzukic to
Atletico Madrid €22 million.
Despite this flat 2014/15 expenditure, Bayern’s net spend of
€135 million over the last four years is still miles higher than other German
teams. In the same period, all other Bundesliga clubs only spent a net €172 million.
Basically, Bayern’s motto has been, “If you’ve got it, flaunt it.”
Although the football club has had no debt for a while, the
group did have debt from the Allianz Arena company, which was used to finance
the €346 million needed to build the stadium. This loan was taken out in 2005
with the original intention to pay it off over 25 years, i.e. by 2030, but the
club have announced that they have actually already paid it off, more than 15
years ahead of schedule.
This has largely been thanks to equity injections from the
club’s strategic partners, including €110 million most recently from Allianz,
but it is still a notable achievement. Importantly, now that the stadium debt
is repaid, it will give Bayern even more cash to spend on transfers. It is not
entirely clear exactly how much more, but former president Uli Hoeness once
claimed that they would have an additional €25 million budget each year once
the debt had been cleared.
This is symptomatic of Bayern’s refusal to rest on their
laurels, even though deputy chairman Dreesen stated, “there is no doubt that
Bayern are at a stage they have never been before, both on a sporting level and
financially.” Indeed, they are already planning to “go global”, particularly in
America, where they have set up an office in New York, developed a US website
and played a number of pre-season friendlies.
Although past performance is no guarantee of future success,
it would appear that Bayern’s financial prospects are every bit as good as
their previous achievements – and that’s saying something.
Hi. Great work again.
ReplyDeleteThe cash injection from their "shareholders" is for me fundamental (close to €300m altogether).
The free up of resources is going to be huge, and I doubt that even VW or Bayer can keep up with it. Apparently Dortmund is going to look for a similar deal with some of its sponsors, but they already sold most of the club in the 90s.
Although legal and in line with the 50+1 rule, I think it is clearly a financial "doping". The point is: why would any corporation buy a 10% stake in a company that does not search to maximise profit, does not distribute dividends, is not in the stock market thus illiquid, and you cannot aim to control as there is large shareholder?
Of course, Bayern's success is their success, as their brand is associated to them. And that is the return they get. So in my opinion, this is just a hidden sponsorship. Why they do it like this i don't know. Perhaps to make it more symbolic, or perhaps to save the tax. But this follows football's vicious/virtous circle: the more successful you are, the more money you get to be even more successful.
I wonder what RM or Barcelona would look like if they started selling bits of the club to large corporations. Their debt sits at 300-500m if i remember well.
Regards
With the dividends you are wrong, Bayern is paying them continuously the last years. Also you should not forget the increasing value of the shares for the companies. Their contribution also allows them to send members to the board of directors and partly influence the further developemenmt of the club.
DeleteBrilliant article, and truly a model 'big' club. All the more impressive considering their TV income is so dwarfed by the Premier League clubs income. Selling off small stakes to key sponsors is a smart & long term move, as they have a vested interest in the club and vice versa. If they continue to make profits as they are they can always buy the shares back!
ReplyDeleteI just discovered this blog. Have you ever written anything about the European Super League?
ReplyDeletePremier league £5 billion tv deal is a total rip off, scam, fraud compared to Germany, media regulator's need block exclusive tv deals like champions league to bt sport, like virgin media said and share the coverage like itv and bbc do for world cup final, have bids transparent and equitable packages so no media has more then 4 packages instead of 6, so bbc dont have to pay extra to make sure motd is Safe for free to air, considering when they only show 168 out of 380 matches. No wonder Germany is behind in tv deal, because they are owned by the fans.
ReplyDeleteAll the growth is just technological improvement not premier league splitting off football league! In Germany dfl bundesliga work together. Things better in Germany and nfl, they are best for the fans.
51% fan owned mean lower ticket price unlike pl. No name change without fan permission.
High average attendance, lots of tickets sold are not attended.
Lower tv sub cost, watch as sky bt price goes up even for broadband.
Need balanced book to get licenced So less debt why does pl with 5bl have any debtdebt.
Winter break helps win world cup, and recover injuries.
More home grown players as apposed to off the self.
In uk you only see 168 matchs out of 380 less then 50% where as nbc in us show 380 marchs live!
Only thing would improve it is salary cap and nfl style split of revenue where 32 team get equal share even shirts, matchday etc! It means the pl is not totally detached from football league and bottom team are competitive to top teams, not the same teams win it every year, Germany even have better academies, which give all round education, if they fail to make it into football like 90% of youth players.
If we had bundasliga/nfl model finance it would be best in the world!
Interesting blog, as usual. Any chance of you going over Schalke's finances again - you did an excellent piece on them four years ago, would be very interesting to see your take on things now.
ReplyDeleteThey are a model club, if your club happens to have fans on the boards of the largest manufacturers and industries in Bavaria. Otherwise you may have trouble replicating their "model".
ReplyDeleteHowever, the value of Bayern's commercial income probably also reflects the number and wealth of their German supporters, where as the City and PSG deals don't make sense to an observer without accounting for the ownership needing to pump money into the club.
What will do this club of 10-15 clubs that are turning very profitable with the extra free cash flow?
ReplyDeletepay back debt for some clubs but it will done quickly... then dividends to shareholders for sure within the PL clubs owned by private foreign owners? charity? Finance grass roots? redistribution to less wealthy clubs? Big question for Real Madrid and FC Barcelona which at some points will not be able to spend all the cash on players and find a road to profits...
For sure after concerns over financial troubles of Football clubs there will be (for a small part of them) concerns over governance and redistributions of profits. How will react a Arsenal fan seing the cash flowing out of the club to the shareholder?
Hello,
ReplyDeleteCan you tell me where you have found the Bayern Munich annual report I can't seem to find it anywhere.